What every dentist must know about forensic odontology: An overview

Author

Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, King Saud University.

Abstract

Background The contribution of forensic odontology to dental ageing and superimposition are always dependent on the dentist’s awareness of the responsibilities in advocacy for human rights and the integrity of maintain dental records.
 
Objective The state-of-the-art article provides insights for undergraduate and postgraduate dental students as well as experienced dentists towards identifying the basic tenets of forensic odontology.
 
Results The article enumerates the classic and advances techniques commonly used in forensic odontology to identify a cadaver’s age, gender, specification of time of death, diagnosing uncategorized diseases and detecting trace toxins which could never been retrieved from incinerated bodies.
 
Advances in Knowledge Not only does this include dental impressions and gypsum cast, but it encompasses all digital photos, intraoral and extraoral radiographs, panoramic tomography, CBCT, TMJ imaging sorted chronologically. If saving blocks and casts need space, they can be digitized. However, the need for old-fashioned physical records is expected to be minimal with the popularity of the use of digital scanners and computational applications.

Keywords


 Buccal epithelial cells are a rich source for extracting DNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification, which could be advantageous to blood sampling [1]. However, its use in forensic odontology is confined to cases in which attaining peripheral blood samples is not feasible. Currently, most PCR gender-typing systems rely on the amplification and electrophoretic separation of the amelogenin gene[2].

 

Gender determination of skeletal remains is fraught with uncertainty, especially in subadults[3]. Although dentitions and their measurements seem to be the most reliable method in age determination, odontometric analyses of canines[4–6], translucent dentin[7], dental cementum incremental lines[8], dental root surface[9], pulp/tooth area ratio[6,10–12] and periodontal diseases can also predict the gender (using different validation accuracy, Rank-N recognition rate, mean absolute difference, linear kappa coefficient)[13], and so is the morphology of palatal rugae in cases of   incineration and decomposition[14–16]. It is a useful adjunct for sex determination for identification of cadavers. Specifically, points associated with the third palatal rugae are the most immutable over a person's lifetime and hence can be used as a reference to evaluate the changes in teeth positions during orthodontic treatment. Periodontal recession is more accelerated in males than in females.  Teeth and prosthodontic restorations can resist high temperatures enough to aid in the identification process if the quality and/or availability of antemortem and postmortem dental records is acceptable[17–19]. Figure 1 describes main experiments in forensic odontology.

 

 

 

Figure 1. Clustered word cloud showing the basic research areas in forensic odontology

 

 

Radiographic image of the frontal sinus, the infraorbital and the mental foramen position as indications of mouth width may also be useful in edentulous skulls[20]. Cheiloscopy (lip morphology and thickness) and smile photograph analysis of elevations and depressions that form a characteristic pattern on the external surface of the lips are also used to determine age and gender in forensic dentistry[2,14,21–23]. Because teeth can be an important deposit of exogenous substances accumulated both in the pulp and in the calcified tissues, they are an invaluable source of data from a toxicological point of view[24].

 

Substantial postmortem changes elude accurate estimate of the time of death. The recent application of histological techniques is proving to be an increasingly valuable tool in forensic research. Early post-mortem examination shows that the initial epithelial changes observed were homogenization and eosinophilia while cytoplasmic vacuolation, shredding of the epithelium, ballooning, loss of nuclei and suprabasilar split were noticed after one day of the time of death. Therefore, the histological changes in the gingival tissues may be useful in estimating the time of death in the early post-mortem period[18].

 

Because DNA can be amplified by PCR from a blood sample, dental pulp or other tissues, PCR is widely used in forensic sciences. It was demonstrated to be 100% reliable when used to assess the gender of teeth which had been heated at 100°C for 15 minutes. Teeth can resist higher temperature for longer times if they are submerged or impacted in gnathic bones, rendering them a rich source for DNA extraction[25,26].

Forensic odontology uses the input of every generalizable finding the dental research introduces[27–32]. However, forensic odontology cannot be useful without general practitioner, prosthodontists, orthodontists and all clinical dentists, regardless of their specialties, being fully aware of the need for keeping permanent and reliable dental records[33]. Not only does this include dental impressions and gypsum cast, but it encompasses all digital photos, intraoral and extraoral radiographs, panoramic tomography, CBCT, and TMJ imaging sorted chronologically. If saving blocks and casts need space, they can be digitized. However, the need for old-fashioned physical records is expected to be minimal with the popularity of the use of digital scanners and computational applications[34]. Dentists and maxillofacial surgeons should also familiarize themselves with the medicolegal legislature and volunteer to cooperate with departments of forensic medicine when needed. Incidental findings may also reshape our understanding of oncological diseases and their infiltrations[35].

 

 

 

 

Notes: None

Acknowledgements: The author would like to extend his appreciation to the Researchers Supporting Project number (RSP2022R480) at King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding resources: None

Conflict of interest: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

 
[1]       Pötsch L, Meyer U, Rothschild S, Schneider PM, Rittner C. Application of DNA techniques for identification using human dental pulp as a source of DNA. Int J Legal Med 1992;105:139–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01625165.
[2]       Bansal AK, Doshi S, Bansal P, Patel R, Barai PH. Cheiloscopy: A lip print study. Indian J Forensic Med Toxicol 2019;13:35–9. https://doi.org/10.5958/0973-9130.2019.00081.1.
[3]       Bielby R, Jones E, McGonagle D. The role of mesenchymal stem cells in maintenance and repair of bone. Injury 2007;38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2007.02.007.
[4]       Cattaneo C, De Angelis D, Ruspa M, Gibelli D, Cameriere R, Gandi M. How old am I? Age estimation in living adults: A case report. J Forensic Odontostomatol 2008;26:39–43.
[5]       Rao NG, Rao NN, Pai ML, Shashidhar Kotian M. Mandibular canine index - A clue for establishing sex identity. Forensic Sci Int 1989;42:249–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/0379-0738(89)90092-3.
[6]       Cameriere R, Ferrante L, Cingolani M. Variations in Pulp/Tooth Area Ratio as an Indicator of Age: a Preliminary Study. J Forensic Sci 2004;49. https://doi.org/10.1520/jfs2003259.
[7]       Shah J, Ranghani A, Limdiwala P. Age estimation by assessment of dentin translucency in permanent teeth. Indian J Dent Res 2020;31:31–6. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_428_18.
[8]       Kasetty S, Rammanohar M, Raju Ragavendra T. Dental cementum in age estimation: A polarized light and stereomicroscopic study. J Forensic Sci 2010;55:779–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01363.x.
[9]       Zhang N, Melo MAS, Chen C, Liu J, Weir MD, Bai Y, et al. Development of a multifunctional adhesive system for prevention of root caries and secondary caries. Dent Mater 2015;31:1119–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.06.010.
[10]     Fernandes MM, Silva RF, Botelho TDL, Tinoco RLR, Fontanella V, Oliveira RN de. Taurodontism and its forensic value: A case report. J Forensic Odontostomatol 2018;36:40–3.
[11]     Vandevoort FM, Bergmans L, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Bielen DJ, Lambrechts P, Wevers M, et al. Age Calculation Using X-ray Microfocus Computed Tomographical Scanning of Teeth: A Pilot Study. J Forensic Sci 2004;49:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1520/jfs2004069.
[12]     Drusini AG. The coronal pulp cavity index: A forensic tool for age determination in human adults. Cuad Med Forense 2008:235–49. https://doi.org/10.4321/s1135-76062008000300006.
[13]     V N, Ugrappa S, M NJ, Ch L, Maloth KN, Kodangal S. Cheiloscopy, Palatoscopy and Odontometrics in Sex Prediction and Dis-crimination - a Comparative Study. Open Dent J 2015;8:269–79. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210601408010269.
[14]     Kaul B, Vaid V, Gupta S, Kaul S. Forensic odontological parameters as biometric tool: A review. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2021;14:416–9. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1967.
[15]     Nayak P, Acharya AB, Padmini AT, Kaveri H. Differences in the palatal rugae shape in two populations of India. Arch Oral Biol 2007;52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2007.04.006.
[16]     Kapali S, Townsend G, Richards L, Parish T. Palatal rugae patterns in Australian Aborigines and Caucasians. Aust Dent J 1997;42:129–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.1997.tb00110.x.
[17]     Andersen L, Juhl M, Solheim T, Borrman H. Odontological identification of fire victims -potentialities and limitations. Int J Legal Med 1995;107:229–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01245479.
[18]     Nomir O, Abdel-Mottaleb M. A system for human identification from X-ray dental radiographs. Pattern Recognit 2005;38:1295–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2004.12.010.
[19]     Zhou J, Abdel-Mottaleb M. A content-based system for human identification based on bitewing dental X-ray images. Pattern Recognit 2005;38:2132–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2005.01.011.
[20]     Satish BNVS, Moolrajani C, Basnaker M, Kumar P. Dental sex dimorphism: Using odontometrics and digital jaw radiography. J Forensic Dent Sci 2017;9:43. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfo.jfds_78_15.
[21]     Dineshshankar J, Ganapathi N, Yoithapprabhunath TR, Maheswaran T, Kumar MS, Aravindhan R. Lip prints: Role in forensic odontology. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2013;5. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-7406.113305.
[22]     Furnari W, Janal MN. Cheiloscopy: Lip Print Inter-rater Reliability. J Forensic Sci 2017;62. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.13308.
[23]     Sivapathasundharam B, Prakash PA, Sivakumar G. Lip prints (cheiloscopy). Indian J Dent Res 2001;12:234–7.
[24]     Li S, Huang W, Duan Y, Xing J, Zhou Y. Human fatality due to thallium poisoning: Autopsy, microscopy, and mass spectrometry Assays,. J Forensic Sci 2015;60:247–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.12623.
[25]     Gronthos S, Mankani M, Brahim J, Robey PG, Shi S. Postnatal human dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) in vitro and in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000;97:13625–30. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.240309797.
[26]     Takasaki T, Tsuji A, Ikeda N, Ohishi M. Age estimation in dental pulp DNA based on human telomere shortening. Int J Legal Med 2003;117:232–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-003-0376-5.
[27]     Bush MA, Bush PJ, Sheets HD. Similarity and match rates of the human dentition in three dimensions: Relevance to bitemark analysis. Int J Legal Med 2011;125:779–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-010-0507-8.
[28]     Cameriere R, Ferrante L, Liversidge HM, Prieto JL, Brkic H. Accuracy of age estimation in children using radiograph of developing teeth. Forensic Sci Int 2008;176:173–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2007.09.001.
[29]     Thevissen PW, Galiti D, Willems G. Human dental age estimation combining third molar(s) development and tooth morphological age predictors. Int J Legal Med 2012;126:883–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-012-0755-x.
[30]     Flood SJ, Mitchell WJ, Oxnard CE, Turlach BA, Mcgeachie J. A Comparison of Demirjian’s Four Dental Development Methods for Forensic Age Assessment*. J Forensic Sci 2011;56:1610–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2011.01883.x.
[31]     Clement J. Forensic odontology. Handb. Forensic Anthropol. Archaeol., 2016, p. 430–44. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315528939-39.
[32]     Franco A, Willems G, Souza PHC, Bekkering GE, Thevissen P. The uniqueness of the human dentition as forensic evidence: a systematic review on the technological methodology. Int J Legal Med 2015;129:1277–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-014-1109-7.
[33]     Avon SL. Forensic odontology: The roles and responsibilities of the dentist. J Can Dent Assoc (Tor) 2004;70:453–8.
[34]     Hamad  shaza, Khalele BA. State of the art computational applications in experimental and clinical dentistry. Adv Clin Exp Dent 2020;1:49–57. https://doi.org/10.21608/aced.2020.150774.
[35]     Sawant OB, Singh S, Wright RE, Jones KM, Titus MS, Dennis E, et al. Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in human post-mortem ocular tissues. Ocul Surf 2021;19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtos.2020.11.002.