State of the art computational applications in experimental and clinical dentistry

Editorial

Authors

Horus University in Egypt

Abstract

The interoperability between computer applications and medicinal sciences has helped achieve stunning diagnostic advances. In experimental and clinical dentistry, computational integration has been incorporated into basic sciences, orthognathic surgery, oncology, radiology and imaging, prosthodontics, and restorative dentistry. The use of computational applications includes building e-health records, assessing health informatics, knowledge retrieval, modeling and simulation, supporting diagnostic decisions, and robotics. This article provides a bird's eye view of recent breakthroughs that have benefited from computational algorithms and that offer insights into potential future progress in understudied areas of research.

Keywords


 

 

 

 

The interoperability between computer applications and medicinal sciences has helped achieve stunning diagnostic advances. In experimental and clinical dentistry, computational integration has been incorporated into basic sciences, orthognathic surgery, oncology, radiology and imaging, prosthodontics, and restorative dentistry. The use of computational applications includes building e-health records, assessing health informatics, knowledge retrieval, modeling and simulation, supporting diagnostic decisions, and robotics [1-5]. This article provides a bird's eye view of recent breakthroughs that have benefited from computational algorithms and that offer insights into potential future progress in understudied areas of research.


The seven most frequently used algorithms are artificial deep convolutional neural networks, k-nearest neighbor, Naive Bayes, decision tree, support vector machine, random forest, and logistic regression algorithms. Applications of these algorithms have introduced several outputs including U-Net, AlexNet, and the GoogLeNet Inception v3, CNN network, Web-available STRING software, the GPU training system (DIGITS), and DetectNet [6-16].


In basic sciences, computational applications are useful for conducting image analysis. Images are usually imported from microscopes for processing using various user-friendly software programs such as ImageJ (with its numerous plugins), Optika Proview and DiversePathsJ. Data analysis can then be utilized for multilevel logistic modeling, path analysis and structural equation modeling to replace single-level techniques for the analysis of hierarchical dental data [17-22].


In orthognathic surgery, virtual surgical planning is used in orthognathic surgery to reconstruct defected jaws with a vascularized free osseous flap, to fix fractured craniomaxillofacial bones, to plan alloplastic temporomandibular joint replacement or to reconstruct condyles in patients with bilateral ankylosis of the TMJ. After building a scannographic template and performing a high-resolution helical computed tomography (CT) scan, collated data are imported into Mimics 10.01 software (Materialise, Leuven, Belgium) to construct 3D skull models using a rapid prototyping device before surgical planning with SurgiCase CMF software (Materialise, Leuven, Belgium) [23-29]. The Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) model is also customized to simulate the upper airway to treat obstructive sleep apnea and to improve ventilation in the nasal airway after maxillary expansion or maxillomandibular advancement [30-34]. In endodontics, the CFD model is widely used to assess the efficacy of irrigant flow in the endodontic treatment of root canals using different needle types, especially tapered canals. The CFD model is also used to evaluate positive pressure and apical negative pressure associated with conventional versus passive ultrasonic irrigation dynamics [35-40]. The efficiency of several different irrigation systems in cleaning mandibular root canals and isthmuses of human molars have been assessed by capturing images with a stereomicroscope and using ImageJ for analysis.


Future applications of the CFD model are expected to nourish the domain of vascular oncology. The integration of MRI, MRA, angiograph and Doppler interrogation imaging studies could be tethered to CFD-based software to explore the best surgical interventions to treat high-flow hemangiomas and vascular malformation by selective occlusion of feeding vessels. The precision of biomedical image analysis could be enhanced when appropriate algorithms are applied to the indicated imaging technique [41-44].


Stereolithography and the placement of dental implants also provides a realistic and accurate forecast of the patient’s facial appearance after surgery. Furthermore, many computational algorithms have been used to assess temporomandibular internal derangements. A 23-13-1 Back Propagation, ANN model was constructed to determine the validity of extracting premolars before orthodontic treatment [45].
For oral oncology, molecular modeling and genetic mapping would not be as advanced without computational effort. For example, GoogLeNet Inception-v3 architecture was used to diagnose odontogenic cystic lesions. In addition, several algorithms use optical tools and retrieve DICOM images to detect precancerous lesions from clinical pictures or radiographs. Furthermore, pre-scaled and annotated data have been used to train histopathologic classifiers [46-47]. Finally, DetectNet with DIGITS v.5 has been used to evaluate extranodal extension metastases into lymph nodes in patients with squamous cell carcinoma [48-51].


Computational applications in maxillofacial radiology and imaging are the most significant. In addition, advancements in computers and imaging have permitted the adoption of 3-dimensional imaging protocols in the healthcare field. Image fusion involves the combination of images from different imaging modalities to create a virtual record of an individual, which is called a patient-specific anatomic reconstruction. This also reduces working time, allows for a lower radiation dose for the patient, requires fewer retakes and errors, and allows a wider dynamic range, easier access to patient information and easier image storage and communication over conventional imaging modalities. These gains come at a very low cost, but patient discomfort, damage to the receptor, degradation of the image, cross-contamination, and viewing conditions are the most common drawbacks discussed in the literature [52]. Recent uses include applying MedView, which is a computer program based on formalized input and registration of all clinical information, toward education and distance-based consultations [53].


Prosthodontics and restorative dentistry began to benefit from computational applications (building software programs) even before the introduction of CAD/CAM, oral scanners and intraoral optical impression systems. The Logicon Caries Detector™ (LDDC) and U-Net were introduced to detect and diagnose early proximal caries detection in digital bitewings [54], while other AI-based algorithms predict debonding of CAD/CAM composite resin. New programs now evaluate the severity of periodontal diseases [55]. Proposed as a noninvasive imaging tool, optical coherence tomography was originally used for the diagnosis of ocular and skin lesions. Later, it was utilized in periodontology because it demonstrates fine microstructural detail that enables the visual recording of periodontal tissue contours, sucular depth and the attachment of connective tissue [56]. The application remains most successful in oral radiology [57-62].


The limitation of the computational applications of data is attributed to a paucity of available medical data, the incompatibility of research teams, and a lack of giant open-source streams and libraries. Because the use of patients’ data requires informed consent, the processing of large-scale data remains a great obstacle. A lack of coherence inside the research group also complicates matters. In addition, several biomedical research projects have been implemented by engineers without consulting any medical personnel. To some extent, the output of such studies is considered pseudoscience. Furthermore, building a team of paramedics without taking advantage of the clinical and surgical data is even worse. After publishing a computational research paper, many authors retain the modified algorithm and do not share the data collated to retrieve their studies. The interoperability between various domains is not possible without the integration of intellectual efforts among experts and institutions.


Notes: None
Acknowledgements: None
Funding resources: None
Conflict of interest: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

  1. Wenzel A, Møystad A. Workflow with digital intraoral radiography: A systematic review. Acta Odontol Scand 2010;68(2):106-114.
  2. Wenzel A, Møystad A. Experience of Norwegian general dental practitioners with solid state and storage phosphor detectors. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2001;30(4):203-208.
  3. Jontell M, Mattsson U, Torgersson O. MedView: An instrument for clinical research and education in oral medicine. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005;99(1):55-63.
  4. Reich S, Vollborn T, Mehl A, Zimmermann M. Intraoral optical impression systems - An overview. Int J Comput Dent 2013;16(2):143-162.
  5. Zhang L, Liu Z, Li B, Yu H, Shen SG, Wang X. Evaluation of computer-assisted mandibular reconstruction with vascularized fibular flap compared to conventional surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2016;121(2):139-148.
  6. Resnick CM, Inverso G, Wrzosek M, Padwa BL, Kaban LB, Peacock ZS. Is There a Difference in Cost Between Standard and Virtual Surgical Planning for Orthognathic Surgery? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016;74(9):1827-1833.
  7. Shaheen E, Sun Y, Jacobs R, Politis C. Three-dimensional printed final occlusal splint for orthognathic surgery: design and validation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017;46(1):67-71.
  8. Lee J-, Kim D-, Jeong S-. Diagnosis of cystic lesions using panoramic and cone beam computed tomographic images based on deep learning neural network. Oral Dis 2020;26(1):152-158.
  9. Lee J-, Kim D-, Jeong S-, Choi S-. Detection and diagnosis of dental caries using a deep learning-based convolutional neural network algorithm. J Dent 2018;77:106-111.
  10. Fourcade A, Khonsari RH. Deep learning in medical image analysis: A third eye for doctors. J Stomatol Oral Max Surg 2019;120(4):279-288.
  11. Bobek S, Farrell B, Choi C, Farrell B, Weimer K, Tucker M. Virtual surgical planning for orthognathic surgery using digital data transfer and an intraoral fiducial marker: The charlotte method. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015;73(6):1143-1158.
  12. Haq J, Patel N, Weimer K, Matthews NS. Single stage treatment of ankylosis of the temporomandibular joint using patient-specific total joint replacement and virtual surgical planning. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014;52(4):350-355.
  13. Philippe B. Custom-made prefabricated titanium miniplates in le Fort i osteotomies: Principles, procedure and clinical insights. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013;42(8):1001-1006.
  14. Kraeima J, Jansma J, Schepers RH. Splintless surgery: does patient-specific CAD-CAM osteosynthesis improve accuracy of Le Fort I osteotomy? Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016;54(10):1085-1089.
  15. Chin S-, Wilde F, Neuhaus M, Schramm A, Gellrich N-, Rana M. Accuracy of virtual surgical planning of orthognathic surgery with aid of CAD/CAM fabricated surgical splint—A novel 3D analyzing algorithm. J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg 2017;45(12):1962-1970.
  16. Anadioti E, Aquilino SA, Gratton DG, Holloway JA, Denry I, Thomas GW, et al. 3D and 2D Marginal Fit of Pressed and CAD/CAM Lithium Disilicate Crowns Made from Digital and Conventional Impressions. J Prosthodontics 2014;23(8):610-617.
  17. Arnaud TMS, De Barros Neto B, Diniz FB. Chitosan effect on dental enamel de-remineralization: An in vitro evaluation. J Dent 2010;38(11):848-852.
  18. Iwasaki T, Saitoh I, Takemoto Y, Inada E, Kakuno E, Kanomi R, et al. Tongue posture improvement and pharyngeal airway enlargement as secondary effects of rapid maxillary expansion: A cone-beam computed tomography study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013;143(2):235-245.
  19. Roser SM, Ramachandra S, Blair H, Grist W, Carlson GW, Christensen AM, et al. The accuracy of virtual surgical planning in free fibula mandibular reconstruction: Comparison of planned and final results. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010;68(11):2824-2832.
  20. Foley BD, Thayer WP, Honeybrook A, McKenna S, Press S. Mandibular reconstruction using computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing: An analysis of surgical results. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013;71(2):e111-e119.
  21. Polley JW, Figueroa AA. Orthognathic positioning system: Intraoperative system to transfer virtual surgical plan to operating field during orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013;71(5):911-920.
  22. Ciocca L, Mazzoni S, Fantini M, Persiani F, Marchetti C, Scotti R. CAD/CAM guided secondary mandibular reconstruction of a discontinuity defect after ablative cancer surgery. J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg 2012;40(8):e511-e515.
  23. Metzler P, Geiger EJ, Alcon A, Ma X, Steinbacher DM. Three-dimensional virtual surgery accuracy for free fibula mandibular reconstruction: Planned versus actual results. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014;72(12):2601-2612.
  24. Zinser MJ, Mischkowski RA, Dreiseidler T, Thamm OC, Rothamel D, Zöller JE. Computer-assisted orthognathic surgery: Waferless maxillary positioning, versatility, and accuracy of an image-guided visualisation display. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013;51(8):827-833.
  25. Marchetti C, Bianchi A, Muyldermans L, Di Martino M, Lancellotti L, Sarti A. Validation of new soft tissue software in orthognathic surgery planning. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;40(1):26-32.
  26. Zhang N, Liu S, Hu Z, Hu J, Zhu S, Li Y. Accuracy of virtual surgical planning in two-jaw orthognathic surgery: comparison of planned and actual results. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2016;122(2):143-151.
  27. Wang YY, Zhang HQ, Fan S, Zhang DM, Huang ZQ, Chen WL, et al. Mandibular reconstruction with the vascularized fibula flap: comparison of virtual planning surgery and conventional surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016;45(11):1400-1405.
  28. Weitz J, Bauer FJM, Hapfelmeier A, Rohleder NH, Wolff K-, Kesting MR. Accuracy of mandibular reconstruction by three-dimensional guided vascularised fibular free flap after segmental mandibulectomy. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016;54(5):506-510.
  29. Stokbro K, Aagaard E, Torkov P, Bell RB, Thygesen T. Surgical accuracy of three-dimensional virtual planning: A pilot study of bimaxillary orthognathic procedures including maxillary segmentation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016;45(1):8-18.
  30. Sung S-, Jeong S-, Yu Y-, Hwang C-, Pae E-. Customized three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics simulation of the upper airway of obstructive sleep apnea. Angle Orthod 2006;76(5):791-799.
  31. Ritto FG, Schmitt ARM, Pimentel T, Canellas JV, Medeiros PJ. Comparison of the accuracy of maxillary position between conventional model surgery and virtual surgical planning. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018;47(2):160-166.
  32. Iwasaki T, Saitoh I, Takemoto Y, Inada E, Kanomi R, Hayasaki H, et al. Improvement of nasal airway ventilation after rapid maxillary expansion evaluated with computational fluid dynamics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012;141(3):269-278.
  33. Sittitavornwong S, Waite PD, Shih AM, Cheng GC, Koomullil R, Ito Y, et al. Computational fluid dynamic analysis of the posterior airway space after maxillomandibular advancement for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013;71(8):1397-1405.
  34. Shen Y, Gao Y, Qian W, Ruse ND, Zhou X, Wu H, et al. Three-dimensional Numeric Simulation of Root Canal Irrigant Flow with Different Irrigation Needles. J Endod 2010;36(5):884-889.
  35. Boutsioukis C, Gogos C, Verhaagen B, Versluis M, Kastrinakis E, van der Sluis LWM. The effect of root canal taper on the irrigant flow: Evaluation using an unsteady Computational Fluid Dynamics model. Int Endod J 2010;43(10):909-916.
  36. Boutsioukis C, Gogos C, Verhaagen B, Versluis M, Kastrinakis E, van der Sluis LWM. The effect of apical preparation size on irrigant flow in root canals evaluated using an unsteady Computational Fluid Dynamics model. Int Endod J 2010;43(10):874-881.
  37. Boutsioukis C, Lambrianidis T, Verhaagen B, Versluis M, Kastrinakis E, Wesselink PR, et al. The effect of needle-insertion depth on the irrigant flow in the root canal: Evaluation using an unsteady computational fluid dynamics model. J Endod 2010;36(10):1664-1668.
  38. Gao Y, Haapasalo M, Shen Y, Wu H, Li B, Ruse ND, et al. Development and Validation of a Three-dimensional Computational Fluid Dynamics Model of Root Canal Irrigation. J Endod 2009;35(9):1282-1287.
  39. Boutsioukis C, Verhaagen B, Versluis M, Kastrinakis E, van der Sluis LWM. Irrigant flow in the root canal: Experimental validation of an unsteady Computational Fluid Dynamics model using high-speed imaging. Int Endod J 2010;43(5):393-403.
  40. Boutsioukis C, Lambrianidis T, Kastrinakis E. Irrigant flow within a prepared root canal using various flow rates: A Computational Fluid Dynamics study. Int Endod J 2009;42(2):144-155.
  41. Kats L, Vered M, Blumer S, Kats E. Neural network detection and segmentation of mental foramen in panoramic imaging. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2020;44(3):168-173.
  42. Fastuca R, Meneghel M, Zecca PA, Mangano F, Antonello M, Nucera R, et al. Multimodal airway evaluation in growing patients after rapid maxillary expansion. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2015;16(2):129-134.
  43. Sun D, Monaghan P, Brantley WA, Johnston WM. Potentiodynamic polarization study of the in vitro corrosion behavior of 3 high-palladium alloys and a gold-palladium alloy in 5 media. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87(1):86-93.
  44. Wenzel A. Computer-automated caries detection in digital bitewings: consistency of a program and its influence on observer agreement. Caries research. 2001;35(1):12-20
  45. Boutsioukis C, Kastrinakis E, Lambrianidis T, Verhaagen B, Versluis M, van der Sluis LWM. Formation and removal of apical vapor lock during syringe irrigation: A combined experimental and Computational Fluid Dynamics approach. Int Endod J 2014;47(2):191-201.
  46. Chen JE, Nurbakhsh B, Layton G, Bussmann M, Kishen A. Irrigation dynamics associated with positive pressure, apical negative pressure and passive ultrasonic irrigations: A computational fluid dynamics analysis. Aust Endod J 2014;40(2):54-60.
  47. Baumgartner A, Dichtl S, Hitzenberger CK, Sattmann H, Robl B, Moritz A, et al. Polarization-Sensitive Optical Coherence Tomography of Dental Structures. Caries Res 2000;34(1):59-69.
  48. Otis LL, Everett MJ, Sathyam US, Colston Jr. BW. Optical coherence tomography: A new imaging technology for dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 2000;131(4):511-514.
  49. Amaechi BT, Higham SM, Podoleanu AG, Rogers JA, Jackson DA. Use of optical coherence tomography for assessment of dental caries: Quantitative procedure. J Oral Rehabil 2001;28(12):1092-1093.
  50. Bakhsh TA, Sadr A, Shimada Y, Tagami J, Sumi Y. Non-invasive quantification of resin-dentin interfacial gaps using optical coherence tomography: Validation against confocal microscopy. Dent Mater 2011;27(9):915-925.
  51. Shimada Y, Sadr A, Burrow MF, Tagami J, Ozawa N, Sumi Y. Validation of swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) for the diagnosis of occlusal caries. J Dent 2010;38(8):655-665.
  52. Jones RS, Darling CL, Featherstone JDB, Fried D. Imaging artificial caries on the occlusal surfaces with polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography. Caries Res 2006;40(2):81-89.
  53. Jones RS, Fried D. Remineralization of enamel caries can decrease optical reflectivity. J Dent Res 2006;85(9):804-808.
  54. Shemesh H, van Soest G, Wu M-, Wesselink PR. Diagnosis of Vertical Root Fractures with Optical Coherence Tomography. J Endod 2008;34(6):739-742.
  55. Hariri I, Sadr A, Shimada Y, Tagami J, Sumi Y. Effects of structural orientation of enamel and dentine on light attenuation and local refractive index: An optical coherence tomography study. J Dent 2012;40(5):387-396.
  56. Rmaile A, Carugo D, Capretto L, Aspiras M, De Jager M, Ward M, et al. Removal of interproximal dental biofilms by high-velocity water microdrops. J Dent Res 2014;93(1):68-73.
  57. Wang R, Shen Y, Ma J, Huang D, Zhou X, Gao Y, et al. Evaluation of the effect of needle position on irrigant flow in the C-shaped root canal using a computational fluid dynamics model. J Endod 2015;41(6):931-936.