Assessment of composite leakage using optical coherence tomography: A systematic review

Document Type : Type B: Systematic review and meta-analysis (with high level of evidence).

Author

Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentisitry, Al-Azhar University (Cairo).

Abstract

Background Leakage under dental restorations is problematic because it allows bacterial percolation and can cause a failure of dental restorations. Assessing microleakage and nanoleakage is one of the main topics of research regarding operative dentistry.

Objective This review compares the assessment methods of composite leakage using optical coherence tomography.
Results Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is useful in evaluating the internal adaptation of composite resin restoration and in quantifying resin–dentin interfacial gaps. The sealing performance of resin cementation before and after thermal cycling and monitoring of cariogenic demineralization at the enamel–composite interface was also attempted. OCT is still uncommon in developing countries. Saudi Arabia is the only Arab country that has conducted OCT-based studies.
Advances in Knowledge OCT (swept-source) is an excellent candidate for assessing adhesives, defects at the tooth/self-adhering flowable composite interface cavity, enamel cracks at the adhesive cavosurface margin, the microleakage of resin restorations, and cavity wall adaptation of composite restoration. The most promising area of research for OCT is the measurement of volumetric polymerization shrinkage in relation to internal adaptation in bulk-fill and conventional composites. The sealing performance of resin cement before and after thermal cycling, and monitoring of cariogenic demineralization at the enamel–composite interface was also attempted.

 

Keywords


  1. Introduction

Advances in restorative dentistry are now synchronized with modifications of resin composite and adhesive formulations. However, polymerization shrinkage of methacrylate-based resin composites during curing may result in contraction stress and a loss of marginal adaptation [1]. Dental adhesives should provide an equally effective bond to both the tooth tissue and composite resin. An inadequate marginal sealing of the restoration can lead to microleakage [2], postoperative sensitivity [3], and debonding [4], which ultimately reduces the longevity of the restoration.

Polymerization shrinkage, the maximum rate of shrinkage, and polymerization shrinkage stress of dental composites of the resin composite can create marginal microgaps at the outer interface of the restoration and interrupt the integrity of internal adaptation between the resin composite and tooth substrate [1]. Marginal microgaps can be identified by an inspection from outside the tooth structure. To find these microgaps inside a tooth, dye and tracer penetration methods have been previously used [2,3]. Because tracers, such as methylene blue, rhodamine, erythrosin and silver nitrate, can infiltrate into teeth, these tracers were used to assess gaps even though restorations must still be cut out [4]. In addition, once the examined teeth are sectioned for the experimental measurement of gaps, the sample is degraded. Even though sacrificing of the experimental sample is plausible, the degree of staining of the dentin layer defines a straightforward measure that predicts the actual microleakage between the cavity and restoration [5].

Marginal adaptation, bond strength, and interaction with the tooth substrate are common methods for assessing the bonding performance of restorative systems [5]. Conventionally, marginal adaptation tests require multiple sectioning of samples, followed by immersion into a staining solution and surface polishing before examination under a light microscope, a scanning electron microscope, or a transmission electron microscope (TEM) [6–8]. These procedures are time-consuming and limited to experimental studies. Measuring microtensile bond strength and interaction with the tooth substrate does not pose as many clinical implications as studies on marginal adaptation [9-11].

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a new nondestructive method for producing high-resolution, cross-sectional images of internal biological structures at the micron scale. Based on low-coherence interferometry, OCT was introduced to backscatter signal intensity within the scattering medium. The signal from serial scans can be transformed into an image using specific software [12]. OCT began being used in dental studies to characterize primary and secondary caries, assess gaps between the composite-tooth interface, and evaluate voids and internal defects in dental restorations.

OCT is a noninvasive cross-sectional imaging method that uses low-coherence interferometry. This technique permits visualization of the microstructure of tissues and biomaterials in real-time without requiring tissue sectioning or specimen preparation. A computer can be used to reconstruct a visual image from the obtained backscatter signal as an input [14].

In the OCT image, an interfacial microgap is observed as a bright spot or line with high signal intensity that changes at the interface appears as a white cluster on the image. When light passes through the interface between two medias with different refractive indices, a portion of light is reflected (Fresnel phenomenon), depending on the incidence angle and refractive index. The refractive index of air is 1.0 (n) and a tooth or resin composite is 1.5–1.6 (n) [15-17]. If incomplete adhesion forms a microgap, air or water may exist at the interface. The OCT system shows a higher signal intensity by reflecting light there. If the microgap is filled with another medium, the reflection is weaker than air. Microfocus X-ray computed tomography (micro-CT) is another useful method to evaluate the internal adaptation of restorations [18-20]. Due to the penetrating ability of X-rays, micro-CT evaluates dental hard tissue irrespective of the depth.

Swept-source OCT (SS-OCT) can construct images using ultra-high-speed scanning of the generated near-infrared laser wavelength and by evaluating the superficial dental layers and restorations quickly and precisely. SS-OCT can improve the penetration of images with a 1050 nanometer wavelength to generate an axial resolution of 5.3 μm and a rate of 100,000 scans per second, which equals a two-fold measure of the highest obtained score; this makes it an excellent candidate for studying dental composites, for the early detection of dental caries, and for extension to other uses [16-18]. Micro-CT and SS-OCT can be useful non-destructive methods for the evaluation of internal adaptation. This systematic review investigates the assessment of leakage in dental restoration using OCT

 

 

 

Continue reading the PDF file.


[1] Bakhsh TA, Sadr A, Shimada Y, Tagami J, Sumi Y. Non-invasive quantification of resin-dentin interfacial gaps using optical coherence tomography: Validation against confocal microscopy. Dent Mater 2011;27(9):915-925.
[2] Makishi P, Shimada Y, Sadr A, Tagami J, Sumi Y. Non-destructive 3D imaging of composite restorations using optical coherence tomography: Marginal adaptation of self-etch adhesives. J Dent 2011;39(4):316-325.
[3] Bakhsh TA, Sadr A, Shimada Y, Mandurah MM, Hariri I, Alsayed EZ, et al. Concurrent evaluation of composite internal adaptation and bond strength in a class-I cavity. J Dent 2013;41(1):60-70.
[4] Turkistani A, Nakashima S, Shimada Y, Tagami J, Sadr A. Microgaps and demineralization progress around composite restorations. J Dent Res 2015;94(8):1070-1077.
[5] Turkistani A, Sadr A, Shimada Y, Nikaido T, Sumi Y, Tagami J. Sealing performance of resin cements before and after thermal cycling: Evaluation by optical coherence tomography. Dent Mater 2014;30(9):993-1004.
[6] Han S-, Sadr A, Tagami J, Park S-. Internal adaptation of resin composites at two configurations: Influence of polymerization shrinkage and stress. Dent Mater 2016;32(9):1085-1094.
[7] Sinescu C, Negrutiu M, Ionita C, Negru R, Bradu A, Pop DM, et al. Multiple possibilities in detection of materials defects in ceramic fixed partial prostheses. Numerical simulation and photoelasticity methods employed for evaluation and prognostic. Timis Med J 2010;60(1):50-55.
[8] Braz AKS, Aguiar CM, Gomes ASL. Evaluation of the integrity of dental sealants by optical coherence tomography. Dent Mater 2011;27(4):e60-e64.
[9] de Azevedo CS, Trung LCE, Simionato MRL, de Freitas AZ, Matos AB. Evaluation of caries-affected dentin with optical coherence tomography. Braz Oral Res 2011;25(5):407-413.
[10] Rominu M, Manescu A, Sinescu C, Negrutiu ML, Topala F, Rominu RO, et al. Zirconia enriched dental adhesive: A solution for OCT contrast enhancement. Demonstrative study by synchrotron radiation microtomography. Dent Mater 2014;30(4):417-423.
[11] Alsayed EZ, Hariri I, Sadr A, Nakashima S, Bakhsh TA, Shimada Y, et al. Optical coherence tomography for evaluation of enamel and protective coatings. Dent Mater J 2015;34(1):98-107.
[12] Hayashi J, Shimada Y, Tagami J, Sumi Y, Sadr A. Real-Time Imaging of Gap Progress during and after Composite Polymerization. J Dent Res 2017;96(9):992-998.
[13] Zhou Y, Shimada Y, Matin K, Sadr A, Sumi Y, Tagami J. Assessment of bacterial demineralization around composite restorations using swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT). Dent Mater 2016;32(9):1177-1188.
[14] Makishi P, Thitthaweerat S, Sadr A, Shimada Y, Martins AL, Tagami J, et al. assessment of current adhesives in class I cavity: Non-destructive imaging using optical coherence tomography and microtensile bond strength. Dent Mater 2015;31(9):e190-e200.
[15] Park K-, Schneider H, Haak R. Assessment of defects at tooth/self-adhering flowable composite interface using swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT). Dent Mater 2015;31(5):534-541.
[16] Türk AG, Sabuncu M, Ünal S, Önal B, Ulusoy M. Comparison of the marginal adaptation of direct and indirect composite inlay restorations with optical coherence tomography. J Appl Oral Sci 2016;24(4):383-390.
[17] Hayashi J, Espigares J, Takagaki T, Shimada Y, Tagami J, Numata T, et al. Real-time in-depth imaging of gap formation in bulk-fill resin composites. Dent Mater 2019;35(4):585-596.
[18] Sampaio CS, Rodrigues RV, Souza-Junior EJ, Freitas AZ, Ambrosano GMB, Pascon FM, et al. Effect of restorative system and thermal cycling on the tooth-restoration interface-oct evaluation. Oper Dent 2016;41(2):162-170.
[19] Tabata T, Shimada Y, Sadr A, Tagami J, Sumi Y. Assessment of enamel cracks at adhesive cavosurface margin using three-dimensional swept-source optical coherence tomography. J Dent 2017;61:28-32. [20]
[20] AlHabdan AA. Review of microleakage evaluation tools. Journal of International Oral Health. 2017 Jul 1;9(4):141
[21] Scotti N, Alovisi C, Comba A, Ventura G, Pasqualini D, Grignolo F, et al. Evaluation of Composite Adaptation to Pulpal Chamber Floor Using Optical Coherence Tomography. J Endod 2016;42(1):160-163.
[22] Senawongse P, Pongprueksa P, Harnirattisai C, Sumi Y, Otsuki M, Shimada Y, et al. Non-destructive assessment of cavity wall adaptation of class V composite restoration using swept-source optical coherence tomography. Dent Mater J 2011;30(4):517-522.
[23] Fronza BM, Makishi P, Sadr A, Shimada Y, Sumi Y, Tagami J, et al. evaluation of bulk-fill systems: Microtensile bond strength and non-destructive imaging of marginal adaptation. Braz Oral Res 2018;32.
[24] Horie K, Shimada Y, Matin K, Ikeda M, Sadr A, Sumi Y, et al. monitoring of cariogenic demineralization at the enamel–composite interface using swept-source optical coherence tomography. Dent Mater 2016;32(9):1103-1112.
....